Melbourne: Broken clouds, 17 °C

Sydney: Few clouds, 18 °C

Athens: Clear sky, 17 °C

Greece Reaps the Fruits of Corruption

Corruption is at the centre of Greece's economic woes

Node Tools
(4)

Rate This

3.333335
3 votes
Your rating: None
It is estimated that the average Greek family pays over EUR 1500 per year in bribes; when one considers that EUR 1000 per month is decent take home pay, and even if you factor in a "black economy" input, that represents one month's salary.
15 Feb 2010

Greece's financial and fiscal problems are front page news over my breakfast table daily here in London.

The EU will probably bail out Greece, however reluctantly, without her resorting to the International Monetary Fund, or through massive Chinese bond purchases. Brussels will do this out of EU solidarity and the need to protect the Euro and even bigger member nations (Spain, Italy) from contagion, but Europe's patience is coming to an end, and the anger with Greece's systemic corruption is palpable.

According to Transparency International, a Berlin-based think tank monitoring global corruption, of the 27 countries in the EU, Greece is tied with its Balkan neighbours Bulgaria and Romania for the lowest place.

Think about what this means. That Greece, in the European Union for nearly 30 years, is on a par with two countries which joined in 2007, both of which suffered a very harsh communist legacy. The figures prove that Greece and its fellow Balkan neighbors have not really emerged from being Ottoman pashaliks; Ottoman norms of corruption are as strong as ever.
Greece resembles other peripheral Euro economies, which overleveraged themselves using credit ratings that reflected the Eurozone as a whole, rather than the country in question.

This is not Greece's--or Spain's fault—it is rather the fault of the Eurozone policy makers who have created a currency union without the fiscal union required to make it work. This is the one "moral" argument in Greece's favour, but her credibility is shattered by the state of corruption in Greece.

Greece, like Spain or Portugal, can be forgiven for profligacy, but not for a level of corruption endemic in Greece.
Most of us who have lived in Greece have our own stories of corruption, these are a few of mine.

In the process of repatriation as a Greek-American, I witnessed the pettiness, inefficiency, arrogance, and extortionist tendencies of the Greek "civil" servant.

This was corruption writ small. As a banker in Greece, I also witnessed the version writ large with corporate and shipping clients. A shipping company finance director told me that, when he sought his company's tax refund, a tax inspector told him it would "cost" about 10 percent to assure that the refund materialised.

It is estimated that the average Greek family pays over EUR 1500 per year in bribes; when one considers that EUR 1000 per month is decent take home pay, and even if you factor in a "black economy" input, that represents one month's salary.
Finally, the Greek government's "cooking" statistics needs no further comment.

This condition has sapped the EU's tolerance to the breaking point, and has destroyed Greece's credibility, perhaps irrevocably. No nation can afford to have Greece's credibility deficit. As usual, it is the poor who suffer the most.

As a Greek citizen, I applaud Prime Minister Papandreou's attempts to bring transparency to Greek politics, but he has well over five centuries of a corruption culture to tackle.

The Ottoman Turks ruled with a combination of extortion and laxity; pay the right person, and you were left alone. The concept of the state as a provider of infrastructure and a legal system were alien.

The Greek, and Bulgarian, Serbian, Romanian and other states which threw out Turkish rule did not throw out Turkish norms. These remained, solid as ever.

Read more from

Comments

Institutions are embodied culture--people design them and they reflect and effect world views. It can be easier to legally change an institution than the culture that created it, although according to Doug North, existing institutions shape future possibilities, as people cannot see anything outside this "box. Legal reformers argue that the only way to bring about a shift in values and mentalities is often to "force" the issue through new formal sanctions (laws). In the case of Turkey, their government and taxation system, in the 16th century, at least (I don't know about later) was based on corruption. It was necessary for its survival. Whether or not that is the reason for Greece's current problems (corruption abounds, after all, in non-Turkish former colonies, as well) perhaps matters less than restructuring what is woefully wrong. I guess the main question is how deep does this reliance upon corruption and inefficiency run, in general, in Greek institutions? Here, the whys matter in the reform movement: so, who benefits and why are they on the take? For example, is the pay scale for some civil servants set at below market value? Or is the issue insufficient regulation in a developing economy with an inequitable income distribution? Ioanna K
Well, institutions are embodied culture--people construct them and they reflect prevailing mentalities and values, as well as effect them. So, I don't think that we disagree. If you want to argue that corruption is ingrained in the post-colonial Greek psyche, the institutional mechanisms that permit its expression still needs to be pinpointed. To put it another way, if Greek institutions were designed to be honest and efficient, culture aside, corruption couldn't dominate, as it does now. (In Turkey, bribery, for instance, was built right into the function of governments and the taxation system. Without it, the system couldn't function.) But beyond this question, how does Turkish influenced corruption differ, from say, that found in many African countries? Corruption isn't new, under the sun. Again, the Turkish legacy might have a peculiar twist but what is it, precisely? Ioanna

As an economic historian, I agree that institutions matter and their effects can stretch across the centuries. And it is an intriguing idea (new to me) that this problem of Greek corruption is the historical result of the corrupt Turkish regime. I'm just not clear on how bribes are institutionalized in Greece. This matters a lot in ending this situation. Can the solution be as simple as legislation? (Institutions rely upon both formal (e.g. laws) and informal mechanisms for their survival.) Bribes are likely illegal in Greece but can the punishment be increased and cash incentives provided for the reporting of any such extortion attempts? Ioanna

If there is one thing I have learned, it is that culture matters often more than laws and institutions. It is why Greece, Bulgaria, and Romania, with a common culture and legacy of Ottoman rule, have a similar scale of corruption. For centuries, either under the Turks or post-independence, these countries have viewed the state as a either a taker of your money, or as a means of support, rather than as provider of laws and infrastructure. This legacy remains, and the European Union is a rich source of honey for buzzing Balkan bees.

Copyright © 2011 Ethnic Publications Pty Ltd | Website development by ANSO